§1 Platform Architecture
The full platform, at a glance.
Five governance dashboards sit above four process pillars. Every pillar shares a common four-layer contract — from HITL-enabled presentation surfaces down to a zero-trust GCP infrastructure that makes compliance structurally un-bypassable.
§2 C-Suite Governance · Five Dashboard Domains
Every domain. One audit trail.
Five independent dashboards — each a deep-dive into a single governance domain — that pull aggregated signal from all four pillars. Each dashboard is a standalone page with its own data sources, HITL constraints, regulatory obligations, and GCP architecture.
§3 The Four Pillars
Every domain. One coherent platform.
Each pillar is a collection of AI modules sharing a common data governance spine, identity fabric, and audit ledger. Modules within a pillar communicate via A2A protocol. Every module is built on the same four-layer contract.
The Autonomous Quote-to-Cash
CCAI Sales Agent handles inbound qualification through turn 11, autonomously. ContractGuard extracts and risk-scores 200+ clause types. RevRec AI classifies multi-element arrangements before any GL entry posts.
The Autonomous Procure-to-Pay
Intelligent procurement from requisition through payment. Supplier intelligence, contract compliance, spend analytics, and AP exception triage — governed by the same HITL and XAI framework as every AE module.
The Autonomous Supply Chain
Asset IQ monitors 12,000+ deployed MRI units and predicts remaining useful life to the day. The €40M warranty over-reserve is an engineering problem, solvable with a unified telemetry pipeline and a well-specified RUL model.
The Autonomous Finance Operations
Three agents above SAP — not instead of it. Intercompany reconciliation, treasury visibility, and AP exception triage, each operating within a governed intelligence layer. CSRD Scope 3 is a native output of the settlement flow.
§4 Four-Layer Architecture
One coherent contract. Every pillar.
Each module across each pillar is designed against the same four-layer stack. Trust is enforced at the infrastructure layer — not the application layer — making compliance structurally un-bypassable.
Presentation
Orchestration
Intelligence
& Governance
§5 Non-Negotiable Design Principles
Architectural constraints, not guidelines.
Every SHAP explanation is written to BigQuery before the HITL checkpoint is created. The audit record cannot be retrospectively amended. XAI is not a dashboard you add after the model ships.
The sap.post_journal_entry() function requires a hitl_id parameter. The SAP write is structurally unreachable without a committed human approval record. Compliance enforced by the write path.
Schema-violating records are quarantined, not discarded. Data loss in a sensor system is irreversible. Every quarantine event generates a steward notification and a reinstatement workflow.
Salesforce and SAP stay exactly where they are. The AE is the orchestration and intelligence layer above them. Every module has a defined autonomy boundary — below it, act. Above it, brief a human and wait.
§6 Anchor Client
ClaraVis Medical Systems.
Munich, Germany · €1.2B Revenue · 4,200 Employees · MRI & CT Imaging · 12,000+ Units · 34 Countries
Sequential handoffs between Sales, Applications Engineering, Legal, Service, Finance, Revenue Recognition, Logistics, and Post-Sales. Each handoff is a human, an email, and a 3–5 day delay.
Revenue recognition, asset failure prediction, and contract risk scoring — all Annex III high-risk. None produce a human-reviewable explanation. A Q3 2025 compliance audit flagged all three.
MRI units send DICOM service events to 6 different regional systems with no common schema. Predictive maintenance is impossible. The €40M reserve exists because nobody can predict failures.
§7 Complete Portfolio
Every page, every decision.
Requirements, stakeholders, pain points, regulatory exposure. The anchor client that drives every design decision in the portfolio.
↗Platform-wide architecture principles, the four-layer technology standard, and ADRs 001–004 that bind every Solution Train. Each pillar's own GCP reference architecture is linked, not duplicated.
↗Four Solution Trains, Portfolio-level shared enablers, and the Strategic Themes that govern what gets funded and in what order.
↗Portfolio-wide adoption sequencing across all four Solution Trains, horizon value, and the EU AI Act deadline as the forcing function.
↗Every architecture decision record with alternatives considered, full rationale, and consequences — the complete decision log.
↗One-sentence definitions for every technical term used across the portfolio. EU AI Act, TOGAF, GCP, and ML terminology.
↗Version history, design evolution, and rationale for significant architectural changes across the portfolio lifecycle.
↗